The Imminency of the Second Coming

The Imminency of the Second Coming

One of the objections to the Doctrine of the “Second Coming of Christ” is the claim that He may come back at any time. Post-millennialists tell us that the writers of the New Testament looked for Him to come back in their day, and as He did not do so, is proof that they were mistaken, and that Paul in his later writings modified his statements as to the imminency of Christ’s return. It is a fact that while Jesus said: “Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. . .. Therefore, be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh” (Matt. 24:42-44), He did not in these passages teach that He would return during the lifetime of those who listened to Him. In fact, in His Parables He intimated that His return would be delayed, as in the Parable of The Talents, where it is said: “After a long time the Lord of those servants cometh.” Matt. 25:19. What Jesus wanted to teach was the sudden and unexpected character of His return. As to the Apostles, while they exhorted their followers to be ready, for the “night is far spent, the day is at hand,” and the “coming of the Lord draweth nigh,” their language simply implied “imminency,” but not necessarily “IMMEDIATENESS.” And the use of the word “WE” in 1Cor. 15:51, “WE” shall not all sleep, but WE shall all be changed,” is not a declaration that the Lord would return in Paul’s day and some would not die but be translated, for the Apostle is talking about the Rapture and he means by “We” a certain class of persons, the saints that shall be alive when that event occurs, whether in his day or at some later time.

It was clearly known to our Lord that certain events must come to pass before His Return, but to have disclosed that fact would have nullified the command to “Watch,” therefore He in “mystery form,” as in the seven parables of Matt. 13, hid the fact that His Return would be delayed. It would take time for the “Sowing of the Seed,” the growth of the “Wheat” and “Tares,” the growth of the “Mustard Tree,” and the “Leavening of the Meal.” So rapid was the spread of the Gospel in the first century that the followers of Christ were warranted in looking for the speedy Return of the Lord, but it was true then, as in every century since, that we do not know what the extent of the “Harvest” is to be, and when it will be ripe, so the Lord can return. Matt. 13:30. Uncertainty then as to the “time” of the Lord’s return is necessary to promote the “watchful” spirit. If the early Church had known that the Lord’s Return would have been delayed for 20 centuries, the incentive to watchfulness would have been wanting.

By “Imminency” we mean “may happen at any time.” For illustration, you hurry to the railroad station to catch a train. You find the train has not arrived, though it is past the hour. Though it is late it is on the way, and it would not be safe for you to leave the station, for it may arrive any minute, but as a matter of fact, it does not come for half an hour. Now if you had known that it would not arrive for half an hour you would have used the time in some other way than “waiting” and “watching.” So, we see that “Imminency” does not necessarily imply “IMMEDIATENESS,” but does demand “Watchfulness.”

It is the firm conviction of the writer that there has been unnecessary delay in the Return of the Lord, caused by the failure of the Church to obey the “Divine Commission” to evangelize the world (Matt. 28:19, 20), and it is past the time when He should have returned. Of course, this was foreseen by God, and His foreknowledge has held back the development of the forces of evil, etc., until the “Fulness of the Gentiles” should be gathered in, and the “Harvest” is ripe for the gathering. Rev. 14:14-20. At no time in the history of the Christian Church have the conditions necessary to the Lord’s Return been so completely fulfilled as at the present time; therefore, His Coming is IMMINENT, and will not probably be long delayed. Let us be ready and watching.

While the writer, as stated, is disposed to believe that the Return of the Lord is “past due,” and while he is no “time setter,” yet there is a “theory” that may throw some light on the IMMINENCY OF HIS RETURN that it might be well to examine. It is called THE GREAT WEEK OF HUMAN HISTORY, and is based on the “Seven Days” of the “Creative Week,” and the declaration of scripture (2 Pet. 3:8), “That one day is with the Lord as a THOUSAND YEARS, and a thousand years as ONE DAY.” The Millennium in the Old Testament is described as a “Sabbath Keeping” period of rest, and is referred to as such in Heb. 4:4-11, where it is associated with the “Seventh Day” of the “Creative Week.” Now we know that the length of the Millennium is 1000 YEARS (Rev. 20:1-9), and if it corresponds with the “Seventh Day” of the “Creative Week,” why should not the remaining six days be of the same length? If so, and those days correspond with the past of human history, then from the date of the “Creative Week” up to the beginning of the Millennium should be 6000 years of human history. In confirmation of this we have the fact that a careful study of the genealogical tables and history of the Old Testament seem to show that from Adam to Christ was about 4000 years, or four days of a thousand years each, corresponding to the first four days of the “Creative Week,” and from Christ down to the present time we have over 1900 years, or nearly 2 days of 1000 years each, thus making nearly 6 days of 1000 years each of human history, and as Christ is to come back before the Millennium, and all signs point to His speedy return, then the “theory” that the “Seven Days” of the “Creative Week” are typical of Seven “One Thousand Year Periods” is not unwarranted in Scripture.

If our inference is correct, then it follows that the Return of the Lord will take place before the close of this present century. How much before is uncertain. If the Millennium is to be ushered in in A.D. 2000, then the “Rapture” must take place at least 7 years before that. Chart No. 5 “The Seven Thousand Years of Human History.” But right here we must sound a note of caution. There is too much confusion in Biblical Chronology to fix any dates with certainty. Doubtless God has ordered it so, so as to keep us in doubt as to the exact date of the Lord’s Return. It may have been 4075 years, instead of 4004 (as generally given), from Adam to Christ. In that case we are living in the year 5993 from the creation of Adam, or on the eve of the Rapture. Again, we must not forget that God uses in “Prophetical Chronology” the Calendar Year of 360 days to a year, while we use the Julian or Astronomical Year of 365 days, and it would be necessary for us to find out what kind of year is used and reduce it to the Calendar year. Thus, we might find that we are nearer the end of the six thousandth year than we are aware, and that the Return of the Lord is IMMINENT. However, while we may look upon the above theory as suggestive and in a way confirmatory of the near coming of the Lord, it is not conclusive, and we are not warranted in fixing any date based upon it. And further, we must not forget that the “Rapture” may take place sometime before the “Tribulation Period” begins and Antichrist is revealed. So, if we could fix the exact date when this century will close, and count back 7 years, the Rapture might occur 5, 10 or even 25 years before that, so as to give time for the rebuilding of Babylon and other events that are to occur before the Tribulation Period can begin, otherwise the Rapture would not be a surprise. It is not for the Christian to look for “Times” and “Seasons” and “Signs.” To do so will put him in the class of those who say: “My Lord delayeth His Coming” (Luke 12:42-48). and he will become preoccupied with other things and neglect to be watchful. Let us live as if we expected the Return of our Lord at any moment.